🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and families are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Trend

In Europe, a growing number of states are considering parallel bans.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that smartphones and networks are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". A law may be enacted next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to enact a bill increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a related step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised guardians to block their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a advisory resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is given. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a solid foundation," stated a leading European lawmaker behind the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in strong data".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. However, the administration vowed to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after being exposed to harmful social media material suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are safe and fit for minors," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, regulation is largely unfolding at the local level due to national stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law restricting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with extra time dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced measures demanding guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from certain politicians to follow Australia's path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Outside of these regions, further states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international agencies adopt a more cautious tone. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

While this global debate evolves, the steps of this nation and others show that policymakers globally are increasingly content to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.